top of page

RCMP LAWFARE PART 2


What shocks me the most about the litigation process against the RCMP?


Could you look at the bottom of the document in the picture? Outright denial of a majority of the allegations.


How can it be deemed acceptable to outright lie in a court proceeding that's supposed to uncover the truth? It's beyond belief.


Perspective I get - you know, we see things differently. I may be incorrect in some of my assertions because of my own bias in this context.


But here's the contradiction: How can the RCMP, along with the AG, deny facts that are indisputable in a court of law, a place where truth is supposed to be sought?


Is it my bias that's clouding my judgment? Stay tuned each week as I present the denial and the proof that it's just an out-and-out lie, in their own words. This isn't a one-time occurrence, but a pattern.


Despite how I may appear in the documents I share, one thing is certain-I will not be a liar. 


How can a court allow this to go on for six years, knowing that the defence is based on lies? 


That Rapinder "Rob" Singh Sidhu, Chris Williams and I will discuss on our upcoming podcast at www.obscenereality.com 



READ THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND DEFENCE HERE:


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page